Irked ballplayer Adam LaRoche takes his son and goes home

by | Mar 28, 2016 | Detroit Free Press | 2 comments

Did you ever accompany your father on a Take Your Child To Work Day? It was probably fun, but you were glad when it was over. After all, there is a difference between childhood play and adulthood. If not, we’d have briefcases in our cribs.

But a Chicago baseball player recently tested the boundaries of workspace and family space. He wanted his teenage son to be with him nearly all the time — clubhouse, practice, team plane, et cetera — and when the team asked him to scale it back, he quit.

In the aftermath, many have lauded the player, Adam LaRoche, and hash-tagged his “#FamilyFirst” principles. They have also vilified his team, the White Sox, as being insensitive, grown-up grouches.

That’s wrong. You’d be hard-pressed to name any company that allows a 14-year-old to accompany Dad to work every day, let alone give the kid his own locker, his own jersey and dub him “the 26th man.”

This was the White Sox’s mistake. They began this practice at LaRoche’s request when he was acquired as a free agent last year. They continued it through last season and began this year’s spring training the same way.

But a few weeks ago, for some reason (some speculate that players privately complained) the White Sox asked LaRoche to cut back his son Drake’s appearances, which had included being on the field and in the dugout.

At which point, with one year and $13 million left on his contract, the 36-year-old LaRoche quit.

He has his reasons, but …

“I understand that many people will not understand my decision,” LaRoche wrote in a Twitter post. “I respect that, and all I ask is for that same level of respect in return.”

Had he stopped there, it would have been perfect. But LaRoche continued: “I live by certain values that are rooted in my faith. … As fathers, we have an opportunity to help mold our kids into men and women of character, with morals and values that can’t be shaken by the world around them. Of one thing I am certain: we will regret NOT spending enough time with our kids, not the other way around.”

That kicked the issue into the hot zone. By citing “my faith,” LaRoche ignited voices in the religious community. In citing morals and values by the outside world, he suggested forces around him were corruptive. And by putting in the part about regrets, he suggested, even inadvertently, that people who leave their teens when they work are somehow sacrificing critical parenting hours.

We should remind LaRoche that long before baseball players could walk away from $13 million, fathers were going to work without their children — and that most people in the world still have to. (Obviously not LaRoche, who has earned over $70 million for playing a sport.)

You might also argue that bringing a kid into a major league locker room is hardly responsible parenting, given what I’ve witnessed in clubhouses the last 30 years. On what planet — beside the “I want my kid to be a pro ballplayer” world — is a room full of millionaire athletes a great environment for growing up? I’ll spare you details of adult language, foul jokes, chewing tobacco and sexual references. Use your imagination. Besides, if Dad is doing his job, he’s hitting, fielding or focusing — or should be. He’s not reading his son “The Cat in the Hat.”

Oh. And what about education? Apparently Drake is homeschooled. But three years ago, when he was 11 and hanging with his father on the Washington Nationals, LaRoche told the Washington Post, “We’re not big on school. I told my wife, ‘He’s going to learn a lot more useful information in the clubhouse than he will in classroom.’”


The exit is telling

Now, none of this is about the kid himself. The fact that Drake LaRoche is well-liked is good but no more pertinent than if he were a holy terror.

This is about policy — which workplaces are entitled to set. Otherwise, what stops all 25 White Sox players from bringing their kids in? Don’t you think cops, firemen and soldiers want to be with their kids, too? Part of really putting family first is the sacrifice it takes to feed and clothe them, which usually means being away. For all their travel, baseball players are lucky: They get at least three months off a year to be with their families every minute.

Adam LaRoche could have said, “I’m blessed to have played a game that pays me so well, I can leave $13 million on the table and go home to my children.” That would have made a great exit.

Instead, LaRoche claimed promises were broken, left as if falling on a sword, and White Sox player Adam Eaton told Chicago’s 670 The Score, “We lost a leader in Drake.”

A 14-year-old is leading them? That explains how this whole thing got so childish.


  1. mercedes3

    I don’t know Adam LaRoche, so this is from the outside looking in. Is this how the dad “makes up for” being away a lot (not to mention the nice paycheck)?
    I have a feeling the most damage here will fall on the son; and not just for the next few months or until this blows over, but maybe a long, long time.

  2. Theresa Ramus

    I can understand a father wanting to spend more time with his son and taking him home. I can understand he had his reasons. All of that really makes sense to me personally. Now back to the article at hand. It wasn’t a good idea to want his son there to get a first hand education on adult human behavior R rated. Not a good idea at all. It is alright for a few hours on one given day but not for what he wanted. I am glad that they put a stop to it.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New book, The Little Liar, arrives November 14. Get the details »

Mitch Albom writes about running an orphanage in impoverished Port-au-Prince, Haiti, his kids, their hardships, laughs and challenges, and the life lessons he’s learned there every day.

Subscribe for bonus content and giveaways!